Court Series #1: The Seneca College Vaccine Mandate Court Challenge
We need a combination of a good lawyer who understands science, a math type who understands statistics, a bio scientist, and a reasonably honest judge.
I think "good lawyer who understands science" is the toughest controllable criterion.
There is a gentleman by the name of Presvelos, arguing against the Canadian travel mandates who likely meets your lawyer criteria.
His cross examination of expert witnesses was excellent. The transcripts are well worth reading.
Super, thanks. I agree - cross examination of opposing "experts" is the key factor.
Well written article. BTW...are you still active on substack?
We need a combination of a good lawyer who understands science, a math type who understands statistics, a bio scientist, and a reasonably honest judge.
I think "good lawyer who understands science" is the toughest controllable criterion.
There is a gentleman by the name of Presvelos, arguing against the Canadian travel mandates who likely meets your lawyer criteria.
His cross examination of expert witnesses was excellent. The transcripts are well worth reading.
Super, thanks. I agree - cross examination of opposing "experts" is the key factor.
Well written article. BTW...are you still active on substack?