Nice work, Gena. There must be a way of taking them to court with some form of class action suit. Also, this would need to be disseminated at large to the mass media. Most of them will ignore it, but the few that will give it consideration will perhaps get the ball rolling.
I'm so grateful for your battle. I saw that this "study" is already being used in Court battles to defend mandates. My father in law just told my husband that he doesn't want my hubby to go with them hunting this year, as my hubby will put the rest (all injected) at risk for C19. My husband abstained from the hunt last year, willingly, for this very reason - he figured he'd be blamed if anyone got C19. But by now, we figured enough facts had filtered through. Then came the Fisman "study." It is disgraceful, the brain washing of people that previously I considered half-way intelligent and with the help of legacy media.
Think about the players in this game. You are filing a complaint with U Toronto, an organization that requires vaccination for campus attendance (https://www.utoronto.ca/utogether/vaccines), and, to some degree, mask-wearing. Would they really be motivated to punish one of their members whose questionable practices supports the overall U of Toronto objectives? It's like filing a suit against someone, and the presiding judge is the defendant's Father!
Nice work, Gena. There must be a way of taking them to court with some form of class action suit. Also, this would need to be disseminated at large to the mass media. Most of them will ignore it, but the few that will give it consideration will perhaps get the ball rolling.
I'm so grateful for your battle. I saw that this "study" is already being used in Court battles to defend mandates. My father in law just told my husband that he doesn't want my hubby to go with them hunting this year, as my hubby will put the rest (all injected) at risk for C19. My husband abstained from the hunt last year, willingly, for this very reason - he figured he'd be blamed if anyone got C19. But by now, we figured enough facts had filtered through. Then came the Fisman "study." It is disgraceful, the brain washing of people that previously I considered half-way intelligent and with the help of legacy media.
Think about the players in this game. You are filing a complaint with U Toronto, an organization that requires vaccination for campus attendance (https://www.utoronto.ca/utogether/vaccines), and, to some degree, mask-wearing. Would they really be motivated to punish one of their members whose questionable practices supports the overall U of Toronto objectives? It's like filing a suit against someone, and the presiding judge is the defendant's Father!