After reading this post, and questioning whether my impression of it could possible be too 'acerbic' I decided to watch linked 'redacted' report to seek confirmation. But I couldn't even get past the opening minute or so. In which you describe the Alberta report as something of a breakthrough...
because it's the first time 'we've had any dialogue.' With all respect(for your fine work)I can't help but feel I'm watching some kind of OLIVER TWIST reprise. Please sir, can we have some...
"For the first time"... your 'government' is offering you crumbs. And mealy ones at that. The brazenness of what's clearly just MORE of the psychological operation that's been going on for 5 YEARS now is truly stunning. But what's more stunning... and revealing... is the extent to which Canuckistanis - even, we might say, the most 'enlightened(?)of them - are a cowed people, thankful for the overtly manipulative and condescending 'limited hangout' this 'disclosure document' really is.
The report does not even BEGIN to address the key elements of how MEDICAL TERRORISM supported by local and central authorities and enforced by 'security organs' decapitated the fiction of 'charter freedoms' and simply bulldozed anyone standing in their way.
A total smokescreen in other words. Designed to leave the perpetrators of a massive crime untouched, and the system which bred them unaccountable. Tis no longer 'the system' that be broken. It's the people who it was unleashed against who are. And I don't see them getting 'unbroken' in the future. The job was done too well.
I understand your sentiment. I had mixed feelings when I first read the Alberta report, which took some time to come to terms with. While the report doesn't go far enough, it is a necessary step in the right direction. It basically admitted that authorities tossed the manual on how to manage a pandemic and did everything wrong. That provides leverage. And the more people who know about, talk about, and use the report's findings, the more weight it carries.
As I outlined in the second half of the post, A LOT more needs to be done. I will leverage what I can from it to push forward. The report did not want to assign blame, but we can do that for them.
Searching for a way to respond to your proposed approach, without being negative, A 'misread of the landscape' seems to be the best way to describe it. Inside the now firmly imposed system of MEDICAL MONOPOLY/MEDICAL TERROR which your country is in the grip of, what 'greased pole' might you be hoping to slide UP via this 'leveraging' of a document which occludes more than it discloses?
Not familiar with specifics from the Canadian situation but supposing there to be close similarity with that of the USA, the system works via 'peer reviewed' journals, housed within institutions which give lip service to 'objective research' regarding 'conflicts of interest' but ignore the financial incentives by which drug companies are allowed to present researches 'gifts' of up to $10,000, before any such CoI issue arrives. But that's just the floor figure, given that the system allows for multiple 'donors' and other workarounds to goose it. So your proposed 'discussion' - on the professional level - will be contained within that boundary to real 'discovery.'
Second problem, and I do in this case know it's applicability to the Canadian case; you have a 'revolving door' of pharm lobbyists who come and go from governmental employment - even as 'advisors' to provincial health ministers/premiers, constantly making sure that 'policy outcomes' are favorable to the interests of the companies who are paying doctors/researchers in the field you are hoping to gain 'disclosure?'
Consider this a 'devils advocate' argument; I wish you every success in your efforts, at the same time as maintaining a firm grip on 'the way things actually work!'
The report was ready a year and a half ago. It probably would have stayed buried for longer had I not outed the fact that the 2 million dollar committee had been running since 2022.
This is a limited hangout of whitewashed bullshit. It's a perfect example of "cooling the mark". There is zero mention that the Lipid Nano Particles are nanotechnology biosensors for surveillance under the skin via the Internet of Bio-Nano Things and the WBAN (Wireless Body Area Network IEEE802.15.6 in the Terahertz Band) contrary to Sections 184(1) and 430(5) of the Criminal Code of Canada. The truth is that the Covid-19 military operation enabled the elimination of millions of people from government pensions, payrolls and benefits thus ERASING THOSE GOVERNMENT LIABILITIES and maximizing stakeholder profits with a FAKE pandemic. This is de facto DISASTER CAPITALISM using MKULTRA SHOCK THERAPY. What about the proceeds of crime stolen from rightfully non-compliant workers like me totaling billions globally? This matter is being heard in secret courts paid for by the taxpayers yet which refuse our access. All of these "inquiries" are pure propaganda and theater.
Thank you for writing this!! I wonder if you could provide actual data, sources, links to back this up? “Massive government spending went into studying and implementing behavioral science techniques in order to placate the public while stealing their civil liberties.”
Trump just gave $500 BILLION for AI / mRNA Gene Therapy platform injections which change gene expression and connect us to the Internet of Bio-Nano Things. Elon Musk and Tesla partnered with Curevac to make the MRNA toxic shit. The 2-party paradigm exists to make you cheer on the same policies you railed against when the blue team introduced them. Trump STILL brags about being the "father of the vaccine" and how the jabs "saved millions of lives".
After reading this post, and questioning whether my impression of it could possible be too 'acerbic' I decided to watch linked 'redacted' report to seek confirmation. But I couldn't even get past the opening minute or so. In which you describe the Alberta report as something of a breakthrough...
because it's the first time 'we've had any dialogue.' With all respect(for your fine work)I can't help but feel I'm watching some kind of OLIVER TWIST reprise. Please sir, can we have some...
"For the first time"... your 'government' is offering you crumbs. And mealy ones at that. The brazenness of what's clearly just MORE of the psychological operation that's been going on for 5 YEARS now is truly stunning. But what's more stunning... and revealing... is the extent to which Canuckistanis - even, we might say, the most 'enlightened(?)of them - are a cowed people, thankful for the overtly manipulative and condescending 'limited hangout' this 'disclosure document' really is.
The report does not even BEGIN to address the key elements of how MEDICAL TERRORISM supported by local and central authorities and enforced by 'security organs' decapitated the fiction of 'charter freedoms' and simply bulldozed anyone standing in their way.
A total smokescreen in other words. Designed to leave the perpetrators of a massive crime untouched, and the system which bred them unaccountable. Tis no longer 'the system' that be broken. It's the people who it was unleashed against who are. And I don't see them getting 'unbroken' in the future. The job was done too well.
I understand your sentiment. I had mixed feelings when I first read the Alberta report, which took some time to come to terms with. While the report doesn't go far enough, it is a necessary step in the right direction. It basically admitted that authorities tossed the manual on how to manage a pandemic and did everything wrong. That provides leverage. And the more people who know about, talk about, and use the report's findings, the more weight it carries.
As I outlined in the second half of the post, A LOT more needs to be done. I will leverage what I can from it to push forward. The report did not want to assign blame, but we can do that for them.
"Leveraged and strengthened."
Searching for a way to respond to your proposed approach, without being negative, A 'misread of the landscape' seems to be the best way to describe it. Inside the now firmly imposed system of MEDICAL MONOPOLY/MEDICAL TERROR which your country is in the grip of, what 'greased pole' might you be hoping to slide UP via this 'leveraging' of a document which occludes more than it discloses?
Not familiar with specifics from the Canadian situation but supposing there to be close similarity with that of the USA, the system works via 'peer reviewed' journals, housed within institutions which give lip service to 'objective research' regarding 'conflicts of interest' but ignore the financial incentives by which drug companies are allowed to present researches 'gifts' of up to $10,000, before any such CoI issue arrives. But that's just the floor figure, given that the system allows for multiple 'donors' and other workarounds to goose it. So your proposed 'discussion' - on the professional level - will be contained within that boundary to real 'discovery.'
Second problem, and I do in this case know it's applicability to the Canadian case; you have a 'revolving door' of pharm lobbyists who come and go from governmental employment - even as 'advisors' to provincial health ministers/premiers, constantly making sure that 'policy outcomes' are favorable to the interests of the companies who are paying doctors/researchers in the field you are hoping to gain 'disclosure?'
Consider this a 'devils advocate' argument; I wish you every success in your efforts, at the same time as maintaining a firm grip on 'the way things actually work!'
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/government-docs-from-2002-reveal-20-year-plan-to-alter-evolution-with-nanotechnology/
https://x.com/DrNagase/status/1891069870038569097
The report was ready a year and a half ago. It probably would have stayed buried for longer had I not outed the fact that the 2 million dollar committee had been running since 2022.
https://danielnagase.substack.com/p/a-new-year-and-the-closing-series
Is a year and a half "plenty" of extra time for AHS executives and Danielle Smith Government insiders to "Offshore" their blood money?
Perhaps enought time to buy a convenient villa where there is no extradition treaty outside of our jurisdiction ?
This is a limited hangout of whitewashed bullshit. It's a perfect example of "cooling the mark". There is zero mention that the Lipid Nano Particles are nanotechnology biosensors for surveillance under the skin via the Internet of Bio-Nano Things and the WBAN (Wireless Body Area Network IEEE802.15.6 in the Terahertz Band) contrary to Sections 184(1) and 430(5) of the Criminal Code of Canada. The truth is that the Covid-19 military operation enabled the elimination of millions of people from government pensions, payrolls and benefits thus ERASING THOSE GOVERNMENT LIABILITIES and maximizing stakeholder profits with a FAKE pandemic. This is de facto DISASTER CAPITALISM using MKULTRA SHOCK THERAPY. What about the proceeds of crime stolen from rightfully non-compliant workers like me totaling billions globally? This matter is being heard in secret courts paid for by the taxpayers yet which refuse our access. All of these "inquiries" are pure propaganda and theater.
https://rumble.com/v6ishsj-394359571.html
Thank you for writing this!! I wonder if you could provide actual data, sources, links to back this up? “Massive government spending went into studying and implementing behavioral science techniques in order to placate the public while stealing their civil liberties.”
Yep and some people andborgs. are tryingnto shoot it down….go figure! You don’t want to interfere with the depopulation agenda of the U.N.
Trump just gave $500 BILLION for AI / mRNA Gene Therapy platform injections which change gene expression and connect us to the Internet of Bio-Nano Things. Elon Musk and Tesla partnered with Curevac to make the MRNA toxic shit. The 2-party paradigm exists to make you cheer on the same policies you railed against when the blue team introduced them. Trump STILL brags about being the "father of the vaccine" and how the jabs "saved millions of lives".
https://solarireport.substack.com/p/trump-administration-digital-control